Nullification: The Rightful Remedy

Description: Nullification: The Rightful Remedy - Brand New DVD What do we do when the Federal Government steps outside of it's constitutional limits? Do we ask federal judges in black robes to enforce the limits of federal power? Do we "vote the bums out" in the hopes that new bums will surrender their power? Thomas Jefferson and James Madison didn't think so, and neither do we. The rightful remedy to federal tyranny rests in the hands of the people and the States that created the federal government in the first place. It's called nullification. And it's an idea whose time has come. In Nullification: The Rightful Remedy you will learn: What nullification is, and the basis of the 10th AmendmentHow nullification has been used in early American history - from defending free speech, to resisting federal slave laws, and moreSurprise, surprise - why what the media, the history books, and the political pundits have told you about nullification is wrongHow nullification is used - successfully - around the country right nowWhat you can do right now - how nullification can be used to put a stop to unconstitutional federal acts, regulations, and mandates Nullification: The Rightful Remedy is an explosive, information-packed documentary from The Foundation for a Free Society and the Tenth Amendment Center. It will give you the tools you need to stand up for the Constitution and liberty whether the federal government gives you "permission" to or not. This film features some of the nation's top thinkers and activists including: Thomas E. Woods, Jr., Sheriff Richard Mack, Kevin Gutzman, Michael Boldin, Stewart Rhodes, Debra Medina, Charles Goyette, Robert Scott Bel, and many others. What do we do when the federal government refuses to follow the Constitution? Nullify NOW! What is nullification? What Is It? State nullification is the idea that the states can and must refuse to enforce unconstitutional federal laws. Says Who? Says Thomas Jefferson, among other distinguished Americans. His draft of the Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 first introduced the word “nullification” into American political life, and follow-up resolutions in 1799 employed Jefferson’s formulation that “nullification…is the rightful remedy” when the federal government reaches beyond its constitutional powers. In the Virginia Resolutions of 1798, James Madison said the states were “duty bound to resist” when the federal government violated the Constitution. But Jefferson didn’t invent the idea. Federalist supporters of the Constitution at the Virginia ratifying convention of 1788 assured Virginians that they would be “exonerated” should the federal government attempt to impose “any supplementary condition” upon them – in other words, if it tried to exercise a power over and above the ones the states had delegated to it. Patrick Henry and later Jefferson himself elaborated on these safeguards that Virginians had been assured of at their ratifying convention. What’s the Argument for It? Here’s an extremely basic summary: 1) The states preceded the Union. The Declaration of Independence speaks of “free and independent states” that “have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do.” The British acknowledged the independence not of a single blob, but of 13 states, which they proceeded to list one by one. Article II of the Articles of Confederation says the states “retain their sovereignty, freedom, and independence”; they must have enjoyed that sovereignty in the past in order for them to “retain” it in 1781 when the Articles were officially adopted. The ratification of the Constitution was accomplished not by a single, national vote, but by the individual ratifications of the various states, each assembled in convention. 2) In the American system no government is sovereign. The peoples of the states are the sovereigns. It is they who apportion powers between themselves, their state governments, and the federal government. In doing so they are not impairing their sovereignty in any way. To the contrary, they are exercising it. 3) Since the peoples of the states are the sovereigns, then when the federal government exercises a power of dubious constitutionality on a matter of great importance, it is they themselves who are the proper disputants, as they review whether their agent was intended to hold such a power. No other arrangement makes sense. No one asks his agent whether the agent has or should have such-and-such power. In other words, the very nature of sovereignty, and of the American system itself, is such that the sovereigns must retain the power to restrain the agent they themselves created. Why Do We Need It? As Jefferson warned, if the federal government is allowed to hold a monopoly on determining the extent of its own powers, we have no right to be surprised when it keeps discovering new ones. If the federal government has the exclusive right to judge the extent of its own powers, it will continue to grow – regardless of elections, the separation of powers, and other much-touted limits on government power. In his Report of 1800, Madison reminded Virginians and Americans at large that the judicial branch was not infallible, and that some remedy must be found for those cases in which all three branches of the federal government exceed their constitutional limits. Isn’t This Ancient History? Two dozen American states nullified the REAL ID Act of 2005. More than a dozen states have successfully defied the federal government over medical marijuana. Nullification initiatives of all kinds, involving the recent health care legislation, cap and trade, and the Second Amendment are popping up everywhere. What’s more, we’ve tried everything else. Nothing seems able to stop Leviathan’s relentless march. We need to have recourse to every mechanism of defense Thomas Jefferson bequeathed to us, not just the ones that won’t offend Katie Couric or MSNBC. Won’t This Make the New York Times Unhappy? More proof it’s a good idea. Doesn’t Nullification Violate the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause? Thomas Jefferson knew about the Supremacy Clause, it’s safe to assume. The Supremacy Clause applies to constitutional laws, not unconstitutional ones. Isn’t This Just a Smokescreen for Slavery? Nullification was never used on behalf of slavery. As I show in Nullification, it was used against slavery, which is why South Carolina’s secession document cites it as a grievance justifying southern secession, and Jefferson Davis denounced it in his farewell address to the Senate. Thus Wisconsin’s Supreme Court, backed up by the state legislature, declared the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 unconstitutional (the mere existence of the fugitive-slave clause in the Constitution did not, in its view, suffice to make all the odious provisions of that act constitutionally legitimate). In Ableman v. Booth (1859), the Supreme Court scolded it for doing so. In other words, modern anti-nullification jurisprudence has its roots in the Supreme Court’s declarations in support of the Fugitive Slave Act. Who’s defending slavery here? Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 Extremely Important Notice on eBay's 5 Star rating system: Ebay charges much higher fees to sellers who do not have 5 Star ratings in service and satisfaction to all eBay customers. We go all out in customer service for 5 star ratings from each customer, but do not always get a response. Some don't bother with completing the 5 star rating and a few don't give it on shipping costs. Those who fail to do so on the latter just don't realize we always discount shipping costs and do combined shipping on everything. On large orders we even check with different shippers to get the best competitive quote. Many orders we don't even cover cost of labor and packaging materials in our shipping costs. We most likely have the greatest feedbacks on ebay for the speed of our shipping, which we invite you to inspect for yourself in our 100% feedback rating after 11 years on ebay. If there is any reason whatsoever, you feel you cannot leave a complete 5 star rating feedback for us, please let us know so we can earn that rating from you. The shipping cost shown in eBay's shipping calculator is almost always higher than the actual amount of shipping costs customers get from us, so we use the average shipping cost as a flat rate. Please remember, when ebay rates sellers for their cost of doing business, ebay considers anything less than a 5 star rating as a negative for the seller and thus higher charges to the seller. Our heartfelt thanks go out to you for taking the time to read this and respond either with a 5-star rating or contact us first to do what we need to earn your 5-star rating before leaving your feedback for us. We are sincerely grateful for all our customers, many of whom have become regulars, so not only our gratitude goes to you, but our kudos for being awakened preppers knowing the extreme importance of being as self-reliant prepared as you possibly can. Thanks a bunch to each of you!!!

Price: 24.95 USD

Location: Hamilton, Montana

End Time: 2024-12-05T17:58:19.000Z

Shipping Cost: 0 USD